Google said it may exit China, the world largest internet market (following north America and European country), after a series of cyberattacks.
What i perceive at this point is, it will create a new opportunity to the other players enviable in the market. But will Google proceed with their decision to leave China?
Historically, Google derives an estimated $300 to $400 million in annual revenue from China's Internet User last year alone. and economically the wealth is estimate to be double the revenue in the next following year with Google planning to introduce a newest Google Nexus One Phone Technology.
With global economics at a standstill, i have full confident that Google have no attention leaving the opportunity seize by other competitors. The threatens was an indirect source of pressure for China Republic to be more unvigilant in a greater internet/media freedom in China.
So, the catch is, if government to government (G2G) could not promote understanding on certain issues i.e internet freedom, let use commerce to commerce (C2C) pressure by all meant. "duh"
After all, corporate espionage effort that exploited security flaws in e-mail attachments (as Google accusation to China) could be make by any teenagers or adults with a simple equipment - a computer "duh" and if i can bruises my IP @ internet protocol from my exact location, so do other.
So can you blame China if the real person who is behind all these is from other part of the world ? You tell me...
What i perceive at this point is, it will create a new opportunity to the other players enviable in the market. But will Google proceed with their decision to leave China?
Historically, Google derives an estimated $300 to $400 million in annual revenue from China's Internet User last year alone. and economically the wealth is estimate to be double the revenue in the next following year with Google planning to introduce a newest Google Nexus One Phone Technology.
With global economics at a standstill, i have full confident that Google have no attention leaving the opportunity seize by other competitors. The threatens was an indirect source of pressure for China Republic to be more unvigilant in a greater internet/media freedom in China.
So, the catch is, if government to government (G2G) could not promote understanding on certain issues i.e internet freedom, let use commerce to commerce (C2C) pressure by all meant. "duh"
After all, corporate espionage effort that exploited security flaws in e-mail attachments (as Google accusation to China) could be make by any teenagers or adults with a simple equipment - a computer "duh" and if i can bruises my IP @ internet protocol from my exact location, so do other.
So can you blame China if the real person who is behind all these is from other part of the world ? You tell me...
No comments:
Post a Comment