
It hasn't always been an easy calculation. Levi Strauss & Co. stopped making clothes here in 1993, citing "the pervasive violation of human rights," but then returned in 1998, saying that the company could do more good for human rights by working from within the country. Time Warner opened about a dozen movie theaters here but decided to sell them in 2007, after new laws required Chinese control and because of limits on the number of foreign films allowed. EBay pulled out in 2006, largely because of stiff local competition.
By agreeing to Chinese regulations, Google has had to delete or block references in search results to the Falun Gong sect, the democracy movement, the Tiananmen Square demonstrations of 1989 and the exiled Tibetan leader the Dalai Lama. Doing business in China has thus cast doubt on Google's devotion to its motto to "do no evil."
That Google's decision to reconsider its business in China is an indication of the tough choices information and communications technology companies face around the world where respect for human rights is at risk. The Google's statement didn't indicate what its other members might do, however.
In contrary, many people in China are confident that the size of their market will keep foreign companies from leaving. Chinese commentators from CCTV, China in the past two days have expressed confidence that Google will not follow through on its threat to exit the country.
I expects that Google will "clarify" its position, and possibly shut down its China domain site and keep everything else. Chinese netizens have grown into a huge number and giving up the Chinese market is equal to giving up half of the future.































